🎮 The Big Problem With Modern Video Games: Why They’re So Huge (and Still Not Better)

There was a time when installing a video game took a few minutes, and the biggest titles barely crossed 10 or 15 GB. Back then, a 30 GB game was considered massive. And if we go even further back — say, the PlayStation 2 era — you didn’t even need to install anything. You just inserted the disc and started playing.

But those days are long gone.

Today, installing a new game can feel like a full-time job. Even with a decent internet connection, you might spend hours (or even a full day) just waiting for downloads, updates, and patches to complete. It’s not just about time — it’s about storage, optimization, and a growing industry trend that seems to prioritize visual “wow” moments over smart design.

So, let’s break down what’s really going wrong with modern video games, why they’ve become so heavy, and what this means for both gamers and developers.

🎮 The Big Problem With Modern Video Games: Why They’re So Huge (and Still Not Better)

💾 1. When 100 GB Became the “New Normal”

Modern gaming has reached a point where most AAA titles weigh in at 100 GB or more — and that’s just the base installation.

Take a quick look at your PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X. Even though they advertise a 1 TB SSD, once you subtract the operating system and reserved system files, you’re left with roughly 600–700 GB of usable space.

Now do the math:
If every major game you install takes up 100 GB, you can barely fit six or seven games on your console before it’s full.

And that’s without accounting for DLCs, patches, and seasonal content — which often add another 20–50 GB each.

So, yes, next-gen consoles are powerful, but storage-wise, they’re still stuck in the past.

Of course, manufacturers offer a “solution”: buy an external SSD. But it’s not that simple — it must be certified, high-speed, and compatible, which often means paying the same price as another console just to store a few more games.

The problem isn’t just storage — it’s the philosophy behind how games are built today.


🖼️ 2. Why Games Are So Huge: The Graphical Obsession

Let’s be honest: the main reason games have ballooned in size is the obsession with graphics.
Developers and publishers alike are obsessed with “photorealistic visuals,” “8K textures,” “ray tracing,” and “dynamic shadows.”

It sounds impressive on paper, but in practice, most of these features have diminishing returns.

Games like Starfield or Forspoken easily exceed 100 GB, yet they often look no better than titles released in 2018.
Compare that to Red Dead Redemption 2 — released seven years ago — which still looks breathtaking at a similar size, even on older hardware.

So what’s happening?

Many studios pack their games with uncompressed or duplicated textures. Instead of optimizing their files, they leave everything in its raw form. This makes downloads larger, load times longer, and player frustration worse.

Back in the PS2 and Xbox 360 days, developers had to fight for every megabyte. They created illusions — fake reflections, pre-baked lighting, hand-painted shadows — to make worlds look richer without increasing file size.

Games like Shadow of the Colossus proved that art direction and creativity can outshine brute graphical power.

But now?
Most studios chase marketing buzzwords like “next-gen graphics,” even if it means your SSD cries for mercy.

The Nintendo Example

Look at The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom. It features a massive open world, advanced physics, thousands of interactive elements — and yet, it’s under 20 GB.

How?
Because Nintendo focuses on clever optimization and design, not brute-force realism. They build smart systems instead of bloated textures.

So, the issue isn’t that modern games look good — it’s that they’re inefficiently built. Graphics alone shouldn’t justify a 150 GB install.


🔧 3. The Patch Problem: When Updates Are Heavier Than Games

Just when you think your 100 GB game is fully installed — surprise! — there’s a 50 GB update waiting for you.

Patches, once meant to fix small bugs or add light improvements, now act as massive re-downloads that consume bandwidth and storage unnecessarily.

What Changed?

In the past, a patch might have been a few megabytes.
It would fix minor issues or tweak gameplay balance.
Now, updates often exceed 40–80 GB, even when the official changelog says something vague like “minor bug fixes.”

So why are they so big?

It comes down to how modern game engines handle files.
When a developer changes even a small portion of a massive texture or map, the system often repackages the entire file — forcing you to download it all over again.

In other words:
If a developer changes one tree on a 20 GB map, you end up downloading all 20 GB again.

That’s not just poor optimization — it’s lazy engineering.

Case Study: Call of Duty and Warzone

No game series is more infamous for this than Call of Duty.
Every seasonal update for Warzone or Modern Warfare can weigh 60–100 GB.

At one point, Warzone became so large that it no longer fit on a standard PS4. Activision had to publicly tell players to uninstall parts of the game to make room for updates.

And it’s not just shooters.
Games like Destiny 2, Cyberpunk 2077, and GTA Online push massive updates that add new content, cosmetics, and seasonal events — but most of it’s optional.

The catch?
You can’t play unless you install them.

So these “optional” updates aren’t optional at all.


💽 4. Storage Crisis: When Consoles and PCs Can’t Keep Up

Storage used to be something gamers rarely thought about.
Today, it’s one of the biggest pain points in gaming.

The PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X promised lightning-fast load times with SSDs — and that part is true. But the trade-off is tiny usable capacity.

Here’s the irony:
Games now load in two seconds… but you can only keep four or five installed at once.

If you’re a PC gamer, things aren’t much better. SSDs are faster but more expensive than traditional hard drives. Installing a few AAA titles can easily eat through a terabyte of space.

And here’s the kicker:
You’re paying for that privilege multiple times —

  • Once for the game,
  • Again for internet bandwidth,
  • And a third time for storage expansion.

All while many games still ship unfinished.


🔁 5. The “Game as a Service” Trap

Another reason modern games are so bloated?
Because they’re never truly finished.

Studios no longer release complete games. Instead, they release a “base” version and treat it as a platform for ongoing updates, expansions, and live events.

Sounds harmless, right?
But here’s the reality: every new season, event, and battle pass brings tens of gigabytes of new data — often without removing old files.

This cycle creates an endless loop:

  1. Download base game (100 GB)
  2. Download first patch (40 GB)
  3. Download seasonal update (30 GB)
  4. Download new expansion (50 GB)

And none of these are optional — the game refuses to launch without them.

Hidden Bloat: Unused Content

Many games even install data you’ll never use — like voice packs for other languages, online multiplayer files when you only play offline, or DLC placeholders locked behind paywalls.

Imagine buying one pizza and being forced to carry three extras you didn’t order — just because the restaurant insists “you might want them later.”

That’s what modern gaming feels like.


🧩 6. What Developers Could Do Better

The issue isn’t technology — it’s priorities.
Games today could easily be half their current size if developers followed better optimization practices.

Here are a few changes the industry desperately needs:

1. Smarter Compression Techniques

Most engines already support efficient compression, but studios skip it to save time during production. Proper compression can cut texture and audio file sizes by 30–60% without quality loss.

2. Differential Updates

Instead of repackaging entire archives, studios should adopt delta patching, where only changed files are downloaded. This is common in enterprise software but oddly ignored in gaming.

3. Modular Installations

Let players choose what they want to install — campaign, multiplayer, high-res textures, or language packs. This would drastically reduce wasted space.

4. Transparency

Publishers should be honest about update sizes and what they include. A 50 GB “minor bug fix” is not acceptable.

5. Better Optimization Culture

Nintendo and smaller indie studios prove that efficiency and creativity can outperform raw graphical horsepower. Developers should focus on gameplay, not file size bragging rights.


💬 7. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1. Why are games getting bigger every year?
Because of uncompressed assets, ultra-high-resolution textures, and poor optimization. Studios prioritize “visual realism” instead of efficiency.

Q2. Can developers make games smaller without losing quality?
Absolutely. Many older games look amazing even today because they used clever tricks instead of raw file size — pre-baked lighting, texture streaming, and procedural effects.

Q3. Do SSDs make large games more manageable?
They help with loading speeds, but not with space. The faster your SSD, the faster it fills up.

Q4. Why do updates take so long to download even with fast internet?
Because modern patching systems re-download large archive files even for tiny changes, instead of just replacing the modified parts.

Q5. Is there a way to reduce game sizes on consoles?
Some consoles let you delete unused packs (like 4K texture packs or language files), but most big games force you to keep everything installed.


🧾 8. Final Thoughts & Disclaimer

Modern video games are technical marvels — but also cautionary tales of excess.
The industry’s obsession with ultra-realistic graphics and live-service models has created an unsustainable cycle where file size grows faster than innovation.

We’ve reached a point where a 10 GB indie title can offer more creativity, performance, and fun than a 150 GB blockbuster that barely runs at launch.

Ultimately, it’s not about how big a game is — it’s about how well it’s built.
Compression, smart design, and player respect should matter more than terabytes of “next-gen assets.”

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed in this article are based on general industry trends and examples. All file sizes and titles mentioned are for illustration only. Always check official publisher documentation for current data and system requirements.

#VideoGames #GameDesign #AAA #PlayStation5 #GameUpdates #GamingIndustry #StorageCrisis #Optimization #GameDevelopment

Visited 13 times, 1 visit(s) today

Jonathan Reed

Jonathan is a US-based gaming journalist with more than 10 years in the industry. He has written for online magazines and covered topics ranging from PC performance benchmarks to emulator testing. His expertise lies in connecting hardware reviews with real gaming performance, helping readers choose the best setups for play.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.